Arab AI Governance Lab

Arab AI Governance Index 2025

Arab states are adopting national AI strategies. Dedicated AI legislation is still taking shape across the region.

The Arab AI Governance Lab studies how the 22 member states of the Arab League govern artificial intelligence. It publishes an open dataset on national strategies, regulators, data protection, readiness, research output, infrastructure, human capital and cybersecurity, and analyses why states with similar resources govern AI so differently. Its principal outputs are the Arab AI Governance Index, a comparative measure of regulatory maturity, readiness, digital government and cybersecurity across the 22 states, and the annual Arab AI Governance Report, which sets out the evidence, the gaps and the policy priorities for each state and for the region.

Filter by area

Regulatory maturity in five stages, 2025 data release. Select a state to open its scores.

Boundaries follow the usage of the League of Arab States and imply no judgement on the status of any territory.

Comparison

Compare states

Choose up to four states to compare the four pillars of the index and their AI readiness trajectory since 2020.

Pillar scores (0 to 100)

AI readiness, 2020 to 2025

Readiness values follow Oxford Insights; the 2025 method revision affects comparisons with earlier years.

Areas of work

Eight areas of analysis, each with its headline evidence and live data. Select an area.

Ten national strategies and nine dedicated bodies; a standalone AI law is still to come.

10national AI strategies
9states with a dedicated AI body
53AI-relevant instruments coded

AI-relevant regulatory instruments

2025 release, doi:10.7910/DVN/MOVIFAOpen this area

Arab AI Governance Index 2025

Four pillars on a 0 to 100 scale with equal weights: regulatory maturity (Lab coding), AI readiness (Oxford Insights), digital government (UN EGDI) and cybersecurity (ITU GCI). The index is descriptive, not evaluative: scores summarise published frameworks and third-party indicators and imply no judgement on national policy choices.

PositionStateAreaStageIndexRegulationReadinessDigital governmentCybersecurity
1SAUGulfAdvanced
91.8
100.071.696.099.5
2UAEGulfAdvanced
90.8
100.069.995.398.1
3QATGulfAdvanced
83.9
100.058.682.494.5
4BHRGulfIntermediate
76.1
75.059.692.077.9
5EGYNorth AfricaIntermediate
74.1
75.059.167.095.5
6OMNGulfEmerging
72.1
50.056.785.896.0
7TUNNorth AfricaIntermediate
68.2
75.042.269.386.2
8MARNorth AfricaEmerging
61.0
50.043.168.482.4
9KWTGulfInitial
55.5
25.043.878.175.1
10JORLevant and IraqInitial
55.1
25.056.168.571.0
11DZANorth AfricaInitial
40.1
25.042.059.634.0
12IRQLevant and IraqEmerging
36.5
50.029.445.720.7
13LBNLevant and IraqNascent
29.8
0.034.354.530.4
14LBYNorth AfricaNascent
28.0
0.028.454.728.8
15MRTNorth AfricaInitial
23.8
25.027.6n/a18.9
16SYRLevant and IraqNascent
20.7
0.021.738.922.1
17PSELevant and IraqNascent
20.2
0.035.5n/a25.2
18SDNRed Sea, Horn and Indian OceanNascent
17.1
0.016.2n/a35.0
19YEMRed Sea, Horn and Indian OceanNascent
12.6
0.014.523.2n/a
DJIRed Sea, Horn and Indian OceanNascentInsufficient data0.0n/an/an/a
SOMRed Sea, Horn and Indian OceanNascentInsufficient data0.0n/an/an/a
COMRed Sea, Horn and Indian OceanNascentInsufficient data0.0n/an/an/a

Method and limitations

Three analytical insights that composite rankings obscure

Fiscal resources, scientific output and composite index scores are the conventional predictors of governance capacity. Configurational evidence indicates that none is a sufficient condition on its own.

Insight 1 of 3

0dedicated AI bodies coded in Kuwait

Fiscal capacity is not a sufficient condition for institutionalisation

Kuwait combines a GDP per capita of US$34,076 and 99.75 per cent internet use with no national AI strategy or dedicated body coded in the 2025 release. The five other Gulf states have institutionalised both. The pattern indicates that institutional choice, not fiscal capacity, is the operative condition, and that designation of a lead authority offers a rapid route to institutionalisation.

Source: Arab AI Governance Lab Dataset, 2025 release.

Arab AI Governance Lab
UAESAUQATBHRKWTOMNEGYMARTUNDZALBYMRTJORLBNPSESYRIRQYEMSDNDJISOMCOM
The Arab AI Governance Report 2026Strategy Before Statute: Institutions, Capacity and Pathways in 22 States
Dr. Anis Ben Brik

Flagship report 2026

Nine chapters by Dr. Anis Ben Brik: where the region is unequal, whether it is converging, the gap between capacity and regulation in each state, 22 country notes with context, evidence and priorities, and nine priority gaps with recommendations.

Capacity building on AI governance

The Lab designs and delivers capacity building for ministries, regulators, data protection authorities and regional bodies: executive programmes, regulator training and institutional development, grounded in its comparative evidence and delivered in Arabic, English or French.

Open data

Thirteen linked tables cover regulation, readiness, research output, infrastructure, human capital, cybersecurity, fuzzy-set calibration and qualitative profiles. All files are deposited on Harvard Dataverse under CC BY 4.0.

Ben Brik, A., Gilbert, N., & Pycińska, M. (2025). Arab AI Governance Lab Dataset [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MOVIFA

Tables, method and known limitations   Data explorer

The Lab

The Lab pursues three mutually reinforcing lines of work: peer-reviewed research on regulatory governance and algorithmic administration, open data infrastructure deposited on Harvard Dataverse, and capacity building for the public institutions that govern AI.

It is directed by Dr. Anis Ben Brik, with co-investigators and research assistants at four universities: Magdalena Pycińska (Jagiellonian University); Neil Gilbert (University of California, Berkeley); Jean-Patrick Villeneuve (Università della Svizzera italiana).

Mission, people and contact